Close
  Indian J Med Microbiol
 

Figure 8: The differential reinforcement of low-rate response 10 s inter-response time curve after eticlopride pretreatment in a within-subjects design (n = 8): 0.02 mg/kg eticlopride (a) and 0.06 mg/kg eticlopride (b). Low dose eticlopride appeared to partially reverse the SKF83959-induced decline in response frequency on the differential reinforcement of low-rate response 10 s schedule, while high dose eticlopride almost completely diminished the response frequency (Experiment 2).

Figure 8: The differential reinforcement of low-rate response 10 s inter-response time curve after eticlopride pretreatment in a within-subjects design (<i>n</i> = 8): 0.02 mg/kg eticlopride (a) and 0.06 mg/kg eticlopride (b). Low dose eticlopride appeared to partially reverse the SKF83959-induced decline in response frequency on the differential reinforcement of low-rate response 10 s schedule, while high dose eticlopride almost completely diminished the response frequency (Experiment 2).